Safe Injection Site Debate Stirs Tensions Between Toronto Progressiveness And NIMBYism
For Canadians living outside Vancouver, having safe injection sites located in populated urban areas is an unknown and possibly alarming idea. As Toronto City Council contemplates the difficult topic of establishing supervised safe injection sites in the City, the electorate is sending less than clear signals regarding how it wants decision-makers to balance the need for progressive social impact with the traditional socio-economic concerns that arise when considering this type of harm reduction policy.
A recent independent survey conducted by Environics Research shows that, although a majority of Greater Toronto Area residents support safe injection sites in principle, most are not prepared to welcome these facilities into their neighbourhoods. Conducted online with 1,153 residents of the GTA between April 15 and May 9, the survey finds that 68% of Toronto adults (compared to 59% of York, Peel, Halton and Durham residents) are in favour of a proposal to open three safe injection sites in central Toronto. However, only one-third of all GTA residents say they would support having one of these facilities open in the neighbourhood where they live.
only one-third of all GTA residents say they would support having one of these facilities open in the neighbourhood where they live
Even Toronto residents who support safe injection sites aren’t keen on having them located in their communities: almost equal proportions are comfortable (51%) with a nearby safe injection site or uncomfortable (48%) with the idea. This finding suggests that even progressively-minded Toronto residents suffer from the occasional bout of NIMBYism. Indeed, a majority of residents throughout the GTA, no matter where they live, share the view that supervised injection sites will create more social problems in the places where they are located.
The survey also found that majorities of residents think that the three proposed locations for safe injection sites are appropriate: 71% each approve of a Queen/Bathurst site or a Queen/Carlaw site, while fewer (63%) believe a Victoria St. location (near Yonge-Dundas Square) is appropriate. When considering safe injection sites across the GTA in cities other than Toronto, residents of suburban regions are decidedly cooler to the idea.
Results reveal other contradictions in Torontonians’ feelings toward creating supervised, safe conditions for drug usage. Specifically, Toronto residents (more so than their 905 counterparts) agree that supervised injection sites will lead to fewer drug overdose deaths (71%), and that they will eventually encourage those struggling with drug addiction to seek treatment to overcome their dependence (55%). However, this is in contrast to the more than two in five who believe that the presence of supervised injection sites will encourage more people to use drugs.
So far, there has been a high degree of consensus among elected officials and policy-makers that safe injection sites are both necessary and beneficial. These results suggest the public has largely bought into this notion as well — although that support could diminish if future safe injection sites are proposed closer to their own backyards.
Find out how can we help your organization
33 Bloor Street East
Suite 900, Toronto, ON
Canada M4W 3H1
416 920 9010
116 Albert St
Suite 300, Ottawa, ON
Canada K1P 5G3
613 230 5089
421 7th Ave SW
Suite 3000, Calgary, AB
Canada T2P 4K9
403 613 5735